<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oh, Bye The Way Did I Tell I Have Given Up On Blogging For Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tucsonseosolutions.com/oh-bye-the-way-did-i-tell-i-have-given-up-on-blogging-for-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tucsonseosolutions.com/oh-bye-the-way-did-i-tell-i-have-given-up-on-blogging-for-links/</link>
	<description>creating probabilities out of possibilities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 09:47:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crystal Elegance</title>
		<link>http://tucsonseosolutions.com/oh-bye-the-way-did-i-tell-i-have-given-up-on-blogging-for-links/comment-page-1/#comment-43458</link>
		<dc:creator>Crystal Elegance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tucsonseosolutions.com/?p=2538#comment-43458</guid>
		<description>hi.I faced the same blocking thing in my past and my problem is not that you have all listed it is because I had used html text in the comment so they blocked my comment for a short period of time...

I would have deleted you comments as well. That is just a rude behavior practiced by short sighted people. You are getting on links here because you used only keywords. Try following the rules and you might be more successful... Your actions make you a spammer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi.I faced the same blocking thing in my past and my problem is not that you have all listed it is because I had used html text in the comment so they blocked my comment for a short period of time&#8230;</p>
<p>I would have deleted you comments as well. That is just a rude behavior practiced by short sighted people. You are getting on links here because you used only keywords. Try following the rules and you might be more successful&#8230; Your actions make you a spammer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray@bridal jewelry</title>
		<link>http://tucsonseosolutions.com/oh-bye-the-way-did-i-tell-i-have-given-up-on-blogging-for-links/comment-page-1/#comment-43217</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray@bridal jewelry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 18:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tucsonseosolutions.com/?p=2538#comment-43217</guid>
		<description>This is a really useful suggestion. I have been discouraged at trying to find blogs to comment on because of the obvious problems of being filtered out,finding good relevant blogs and also the discouragement of the no follow standard.

I have liked one site that takes a lot of work but I get good traffic from it and also get some value from the links.I get good rankings (90-94 usually out of 100)for writing good content and as you said it becomes a pleasure instead of a bore.

My hubber name on hubpages is Seabastian and I would appreciate any feedback if you have time.

I would like a list of the sites that you find useful but since your experience with the one you mentioned on the blog before was negative-it might be better not to publish one. Maybe you could give some ideas on how I should go about getting my own list. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a really useful suggestion. I have been discouraged at trying to find blogs to comment on because of the obvious problems of being filtered out,finding good relevant blogs and also the discouragement of the no follow standard.</p>
<p>I have liked one site that takes a lot of work but I get good traffic from it and also get some value from the links.I get good rankings (90-94 usually out of 100)for writing good content and as you said it becomes a pleasure instead of a bore.</p>
<p>My hubber name on hubpages is Seabastian and I would appreciate any feedback if you have time.</p>
<p>I would like a list of the sites that you find useful but since your experience with the one you mentioned on the blog before was negative-it might be better not to publish one. Maybe you could give some ideas on how I should go about getting my own list. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Girish@Auckland Car Rental</title>
		<link>http://tucsonseosolutions.com/oh-bye-the-way-did-i-tell-i-have-given-up-on-blogging-for-links/comment-page-1/#comment-42885</link>
		<dc:creator>Girish@Auckland Car Rental</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 05:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tucsonseosolutions.com/?p=2538#comment-42885</guid>
		<description>I have faced similar problems in the past, although spam filters blocked me only a little. My problem was different. I dont post on all the blogs I find. I choose blogs which are do follow and have great content and very less comments. But nowadays it has become very hard to find blogs like that. Only a very few exists and if you are not the first few to comment then better you dont comment. Yes that is the way it is. :( I am surprised when you said that 43% of the 100 comments you made got accepted. Which means 43 links. They are definitely contributing and much worthier as it gets older and older. Google loves old links.This scratch my back marketing technique is new to me and I wish I could easily understand the logic and contribute something worthy. 

Thanks,
Girish

&lt;strong&gt;Admin:&lt;/strong&gt; Great Comment! Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have faced similar problems in the past, although spam filters blocked me only a little. My problem was different. I dont post on all the blogs I find. I choose blogs which are do follow and have great content and very less comments. But nowadays it has become very hard to find blogs like that. Only a very few exists and if you are not the first few to comment then better you dont comment. Yes that is the way it is. :( I am surprised when you said that 43% of the 100 comments you made got accepted. Which means 43 links. They are definitely contributing and much worthier as it gets older and older. Google loves old links.This scratch my back marketing technique is new to me and I wish I could easily understand the logic and contribute something worthy. </p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Girish</p>
<p><strong>Admin:</strong> Great Comment! Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark@Bunn Coffee Filters</title>
		<link>http://tucsonseosolutions.com/oh-bye-the-way-did-i-tell-i-have-given-up-on-blogging-for-links/comment-page-1/#comment-42757</link>
		<dc:creator>mark@Bunn Coffee Filters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tucsonseosolutions.com/?p=2538#comment-42757</guid>
		<description>I have had the very same thing happened to me with being blocked by spam filters, even when I was genuinely contributing to the blog. This is all related to being filtered because of SEO, so I&#039;m glad to see that this has happened to someone else. However, 43% of comments approved is not very good at all!

&lt;strong&gt;Admin:&lt;/strong&gt; Hi Mark, I have learned to test everything that I do on the Internet. I am always testing for ROI and this came as a shocker to me. So I am very content to stick with Social media membership sites. I almost never run into any filters or problems as I go in with the intent of adding value and it works. This is an additional benefit that came from the 109 Day Link building explosion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had the very same thing happened to me with being blocked by spam filters, even when I was genuinely contributing to the blog. This is all related to being filtered because of SEO, so I&#8217;m glad to see that this has happened to someone else. However, 43% of comments approved is not very good at all!</p>
<p><strong>Admin:</strong> Hi Mark, I have learned to test everything that I do on the Internet. I am always testing for ROI and this came as a shocker to me. So I am very content to stick with Social media membership sites. I almost never run into any filters or problems as I go in with the intent of adding value and it works. This is an additional benefit that came from the 109 Day Link building explosion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

